Opinion · Nylaw New York

BORDO CORPORATION v. WITTY, 300 N.Y. 747 (____)

BORDO Corp., Landlord, Appellant, v. EPHRAEM D. WITTY, Tenant,Respondent., 92 N.E.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 2026)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 2026-07-14
Topic: general

BORDO CORPORATION v. WITTY, 300 N.Y. 747 (____) 92 N.E.2d 457 BORDO CORPORATION, Landlord, Appellant, v. EPHRAEM D. WITTY, Tenant,Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 20, 1950Reargument ordered April 13, 1950. Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, GOODMAN, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BORDO CORPORATION v. WITTY, 300 N.Y. 747 (____). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BORDO CORPORATIONv.WITTY,300 N.Y. 747(____)

92 N.E.2d 457

BORDO CORPORATION, Landlord, Appellant,v.EPHRAEM D. WITTY, Tenant,

Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 20, 1950

Reargument ordered April 13, 1950.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, GOODMAN, J.Page 748

Ruth Ransonfor appellant.Walter FeldesmanandJoseph G. Abramsonfor respondent.Nathan W. Math, Joseph JayandAlfred Weinsteinfor Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York,amicus curiae,in support of respondent's position.

Reargument ordered to be heard during the session to begin May 15, 1950. Counsel are requested upon reargument to discuss the effect of the new State Rent Control Law [L. 1950, ch. 250] upon this appeal.