Opinion · Nylaw New York

BERTRAND v. HINCKLEY FIBER COMPANY, 148 App. Div. 900 (1911)

Dorilda Bertrand, as Adm’r, Adm’x, Respondent, v. Hinckley FiberCompany, Appellant., 148 A.D. 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1911)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1911-01-01
Topic: general

BERTRAND v. HINCKLEY FIBER COMPANY, 148 App. Div. 900 (1911) Dorilda Bertrand, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. Hinckley FiberCompany, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. December, 1911.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BERTRAND v. HINCKLEY FIBER COMPANY, 148 App. Div. 900 (1911). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BERTRAND v. HINCKLEY FIBER COMPANY,148 App. Div. 900(1911)

Dorilda Bertrand, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. Hinckley Fiber

Company, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

December, 1911.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.