Opinion · Nylaw New York

BECKER v. UNGAR, 236 App. Div. 836 (1932)

ANTONIE BECKER, Respondent, v. Vict. G. UNGAR, Doing Bus., etc., andAnother, Appellants., 236 A.D. 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1932-01-01
Topic: general

BECKER v. UNGAR, 236 App. Div. 836 (1932) ANTONIE BECKER, Respondent, v. VICTORIA G. UNGAR, Doing Business, etc., andAnother, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BECKER v. UNGAR, 236 App. Div. 836 (1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BECKER v. UNGAR,236 App. Div. 836(1932)

ANTONIE BECKER, Respondent, v. VICTORIA G. UNGAR, Doing Business, etc., and

Another, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

November, 1932.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, O'Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.