Opinion · Orlaw Oregon

BANDA v. DANNER, 307 Or. 302 (1989)

BANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant/Respondent on Rev., v. DANNER et al,Defendants, & UMATILLA Hosp. Dist. NO. 1,Defendant-Respondent/Petitioner on Review., 766 P.2d 385 (Or. 1989)

Type
Opinion
Court
Orlaw Oregon
Jurisdiction
Orlaw
Date
1988-12-30
Topic
general

BANDA v. DANNER, 307 Or. 302 (1989) 766 P.2d 385 BANDA, Plaintiff-Appellant/Respondent on Review, v. DANNER et al,Defendants, and UMATILLA HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1,Defendant-Respondent/Petitioner on Review. TC A8401-00096; CA A40303; SC S34591Oregon Supreme Court.Argued and submitted March 2, 1988 December 30, 1988,denied February 14, 1989 In Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.[fn*] [fn*] Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Hon. Charles S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BANDA v. DANNER, 307 Or. 302 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BANDA v. DANNER,307 Or. 302(1989)
766 P.2d 385
BANDA,Plaintiff-Appellant/Respondent on Review,v. DANNER et al,
Defendants, andUMATILLA HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1,
Defendant-Respondent/Petitioner on Review.
TC A8401-00096; CA A40303; SC S34591
Oregon Supreme Court.
Argued and submitted March 2, 1988
December 30, 1988,
denied February 14, 1989
In Banc
On review from the Court of Appeals.fn*
Lee Aronson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition on behalf of petitioner on review. With him on the petition were James C. Carter and Holmes, DeFrancq Schulte, P.C., Portland.

Richard P. Noble, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the response on behalf of the respondent on review. With him on the response was Kathryn H. Clarke, Lake Oswego.

Keith J. Bauer and Billy M. Sime of Parks Bauer, Salem, filed anamicus curiaebrief on behalf of the Oregon Association of Defense Counsel.

John Paul Graff of Graff O'Neil, Portland, filed anamicuscuriaebrief on behalf of the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.
Affirmed by an equally divided court.Page 303
  1. Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Hon. Charles S. Williamson, Judge pro tem.87 Or. App. 69,741 P.2d 514(1987). ↩