Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

BAJORAS v. UNITED STATES, 100 F.2d 1009 (3rd Cir. 1938)

Joseph C. BAJORAS, Appellant, v. United States, Appellee.[fn*], 100 F.2d 1009 (3d Cir. 1938)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1938-12-12
Topic
general

BAJORAS v. UNITED STATES, 100 F.2d 1009 (3rd Cir. 1938) Joseph C. BAJORAS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.[fn*] No. 6930.Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. December 12, 1938. [fn*] Writ of certiorari denied 59 S.Ct. 587, 83 L.Ed. ___.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BAJORAS v. UNITED STATES, 100 F.2d 1009 (3rd Cir. 1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BAJORAS v. UNITED STATES,100 F.2d 1009(3rd Cir. 1938)
Joseph C. BAJORAS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.fn*
No. 6930.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
December 12, 1938.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Frederic P. Schoonmaker, Judge.
John J. Cohen, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Charles F. Uhl, U.S. Atty., and George Mashank, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Before DAVIS, BIGGS, and BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We can find no error in the record of this cause. The order revoking the probation of the appellant is affirmed.Page 1010
  1. Writ of certiorari denied 59 S.Ct. 587, 83 L.Ed. ___. ↩