Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

ANKERMAN v. MANCUSO, 266 Conn. 925 (2003)

WILLIAM L. ANKERMAN v. JACK C. MANCUSO, 835 A.2d 471 (Conn. 2003)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 2003-11-04
Topic: general

ANKERMAN v. MANCUSO, 266 Conn. 925 (2003) 835 A.2d 471 WILLIAM L. ANKERMAN v. JACK C. MANCUSOSupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ANKERMAN v. MANCUSO, 266 Conn. 925 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ANKERMAN v. MANCUSO,266 Conn. 925(2003)

835 A.2d 471

WILLIAM L. ANKERMAN v. JACK C. MANCUSO

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,79 Conn. App. 480(AC 23369), is granted, limited to the following issue:Page 926

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly refused to enforce a secondary mortgage loan transaction made by an attorney with a client despite its finding that the transaction violated the public policy underlying rule 1.8(j) of the Rules of Professional Conduct?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17086.James Colin Mulholland, in support of the petition.William L. Ankerman, pro se, in opposition.

Decided November 4, 2003