Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

AMODIO v. AMODIO, 253 Conn. 910 (2000)

754 A.2d 162

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2000-05-18
Topic
general

AMODIO v. AMODIO, 253 Conn. 910 (2000) 754 A.2d 162 DEBORAH A. AMODIO v. VINCENT N. AMODIO[fn*]Supreme Court of Connecticut [fn*] The appeal was withdrawn September 27, 2000.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed AMODIO v. AMODIO, 253 Conn. 910 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

AMODIO v. AMODIO,253 Conn. 910(2000)
754 A.2d 162
DEBORAH A. AMODIOv.VINCENT N. AMODIOfn*
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,56 Conn. App. 459(AC 15692), is granted, limited to the following issues:Page 911

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its authority under General Statutes §46b-86(a) and improperly appliedMcHughv.McHugh,27 Conn. App. 724,609 A.2d 250(1992)?

"`2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the child support order in this case was nonmodifiable?"

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16312.Donald L. Altschuler, in support of the petition.
Decided May 18, 2000
  1. The appeal was withdrawn September 27, 2000. ↩