Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

ALLSTATE v. FRED'S, 2009-2275 (La. 1/29/10); 25 So.3d 821

ALLSTATE Ins. Co. v. FRED'S INC., 25 So. 3d 821 (La. 2009)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 2010-01-29
Topic: general

ALLSTATE v. FRED'S, 2009-2275 (La. 1/29/10); 25 So.3d 821 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FRED'S INC. No. 2009-C-2275.Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 29, 2010.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ALLSTATE v. FRED'S, 2009-2275 (La. 1/29/10); 25 So.3d 821. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ALLSTATE v. FRED'S, 2009-2275 (La. 1/29/10);25 So.3d 821

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FRED'S INC.

No. 2009-C-2275.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 29, 2010.

Prior report: La.App.,18 So.3d 172.

In re Colony Insurance Company; L L Import Enterprises Inc. d/b/a; Van Troxel International Inc.; — Defendant(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 483,742; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 44,508-CA.

Writ granted. We reverse the court of appeal decision finding the doctrine of contra non valentem applicable to the facts presented. The court of appeal erred in finding Allstate's delay "cannot be attributable to its own neglect," an essential element in a defense to prescription based on this doctrine. Allstate's two-year delay between its discovery request and its motion to compel, plus an additional year before adding Colony to the suit, evidences a lack of due diligence on the part of Allstate, precluding application of the contra non valentem doctrine. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the court of appeal and remand to the court of appeal for consideration of pretermitted issues not addressed in the original opinion.

JOHNSON, J., would deny.

WEIMER, J., would deny.