Opinion · Nylaw New York

ABRAMS v. DISCOUNT, 255 App. Div. 975 (1938)

AL ABRAMS & JACK COOPERMAN, Copartners under the Trade Name & Style ofABRAMS COOPERMAN, Respondents, v. SADIE Disc. & ISIDOR WOLKIN,Appellants., 255 A.D. 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1938)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1938-12-05
Topic: general

ABRAMS v. DISCOUNT, 255 App. Div. 975 (1938) AL ABRAMS and JACK COOPERMAN, Copartners under the Trade Name and Style ofABRAMS COOPERMAN, Respondents, v. SADIE DISCOUNT and ISIDOR WOLKIN,Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. December 5, 1938.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ABRAMS v. DISCOUNT, 255 App. Div. 975 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ABRAMS v. DISCOUNT,255 App. Div. 975(1938)

AL ABRAMS and JACK COOPERMAN, Copartners under the Trade Name and Style of

ABRAMS COOPERMAN, Respondents, v. SADIE DISCOUNT and ISIDOR WOLKIN,

Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December 5, 1938.

In a judgment creditor's action to set aside an assignment of a judgment by defendant Discount to defendant Wolkin as fraudulent under the Debtor and Creditor Law, the plaintiffs had judgment. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.