Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Brandenburg v. Ohio

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1969-06-09
Topic: bankruptcy

Mr. Justice Black, concurring. I agree with the views expressed by Mr. Justice Douglas in his concurring opinion in this case that the “clear and present danger” doctrine should have no place *450in the interpretation of the First Amendment. I join the Court’s opinion, which, as I understand it, simply cites Dennis v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brandenburg v. Ohio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Mr. Justice Black,

concurring.

I agree with the views expressed by Mr. Justice Douglas in his concurring opinion in this case that the “clear and present danger” doctrine should have no place *450 in the interpretation of the First Amendment. I join the Court’s opinion, which, as I understand it, simply cites Dennis v. United States, 341 U. S. 494 (1951), but does not indicate any agreement on the Court’s part with the “clear and present danger” doctrine on which Dennis purported to rely.