Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.
Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co., 65 Ohio St. 3d 1203 (Ohio 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1992-12-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- affirming lower court's ruling that "[bjecause appellee's complaint challenges the existence of a contract between the parties ..., the arbitration clause in the loan agreement may not be enforced until the question of the existence of the contract is resolved”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Walsh, JJ., concur. Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent. James E. Walsh, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.