Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Nicholas

State v. Nicholas, 84 Ohio St. 3d 20 (Ohio 1998)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Date: 1998-11-25
Topic: litigation

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Nicholas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at

84 Ohio St.3d 20

.]




       THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NICHOLAS ET AL., APPELLANTS.
                     [Cite as State v. Nicholas,

1998-Ohio-698

.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.
   (No. 98-1016—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, Nos. CA97-04-035,
CA97-04-036, CA97-05-040, CA97-05-044, CA97-05-045, CA97-05-046, CA97-
                      05-047, CA97-05-052, and CA97-06-063.
                                  __________________
        Timothy A. Oliver, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carolyn A.
Duvelius, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Gray & Duning and Donald E. Oda II, for appellants.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998),

83 Ohio St.3d 404

700 N.E.2d 570

.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________