Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Buell
70 Ohio St. 3d 1211
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1994-09-28
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- finding that the right to appointed counsel in Ohio "extends to the first appeal as of right, and no further ”
- relying on "and no further" to extend the right to counsel only to first appeals as of right
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Buell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 34 opinions
We deny the motion. Buell’s 1986 appeal to this court was his second appeal. “[T]he right to appointed counsel extends to the first appeal as of right, and no further.” (Emphasis added.) Pennsylvania v. Finley (1987), 481 U.S. 551, 555, 107 S.Ct. 1990, 1993, 95 L.Ed.2d 539, 545. See, also, Evitts v. Lucey (1985), 469 U.S. 387, 394, 105 S.Ct. 830, 834-835, 83 L.Ed.2d 821, 828. Having no constitutional right to counsel on a second appeal, Buell had no constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. See Wainwright v. Torna (1982), 455 U.S. 586, 587-588, 102 S.Ct. 1300, 1301, 71 L.Ed.2d 475, 477-478; Evitts, supra, 469 U.S. at 397, 105 S.Ct. at 836, 83 L.Ed.2d at 830, fn. 7.
Motion denied.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., concurs in judgment only.