Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Brandenburg (Slip Opinion)
146 Ohio St. 3d 221
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 2016-05-17
- Topic
- bankruptcy
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Brandenburg, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-2970.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-2970 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BRANDENBURG, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v.
Citator
- Cited by
- 40 opinions
{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.
*222 Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lina N. Akam-hawi, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Charles M. Conliff, for appellant.‘{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.