Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle
138 Ohio St. 3d 1424
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 2014-02-27
- Topic
- general
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relators’ emergency motion for peremptory or alternative writ of prohibition, it is ordered by the court that respondent shall file a response to the complaint within 10 days of the date of this entry in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04. If respondent files a motion to dismiss or a motion for judgment on the pleadings in response to the complaint, relators may file a memorandum in response within five days of the filing of the motion.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm. v. McMonagle. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.
Upon consideration of relators’ emergency motion for peremptory or alternative writ of prohibition, it is ordered by the court that respondent shall file a response to the complaint within 10 days of the date of this entry in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04. If respondent files a motion to dismiss or a motion for judgment on the pleadings in response to the complaint, relators may file a memorandum in response within five days of the filing of the motion.