Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Fant v. Regional Transit Authority

48 Ohio St. 3d 39

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Date
1990-01-10
Topic
litigation

The judgment of the court of appeals of June 1,1989 dividing the costs of the action between relator and respondent is affirmed. Pursuant to Civ. R. 54(D), the court has discretion as to how the costs of an action shall be assessed. Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Fant v. Regional Transit Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals of June 1,1989 dividing the costs of the action between relator and respondent is affirmed. Pursuant to Civ. R. 54(D), the court has discretion as to how the costs of an action shall be assessed.

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., not participating.