Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Akbar-El v. Court of Common Pleas
State ex rel. Akbar-El v. Court of Common Pleas, 94 Ohio St. 3d 210 (Ohio 2002)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 2002-02-06
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. In May 2001, appellant, Ali A. Akbar-El, an inmate, filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, to vacate its judgment of conviction and sentence. Akbar-El claimed that the judgment was void. He did not attach the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) describing his previous civil actions and appeals.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State ex rel. Akbar-El v. Court of Common Pleas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 36 opinions
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at94 Ohio St.3d 210
.]
THE STATE EX REL. AKBAR-EL, APPELLANT, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, APPELLEE.
[Cite as State ex rel. Akbar-El v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas,
2002-Ohio-475
.]
Mandamus sought to compel Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to vacate
relator’s judgment of conviction and sentence—Dismissal of complaint by
court of appeals for failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) affirmed.
(No. 01-1424—Submitted November 27, 2001—Decided February 6, 2002.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 79692.
__________________
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} In May 2001, appellant, Ali A. Akbar-El, an inmate, filed a complaint
in the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County for a writ of mandamus to compel
appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, to vacate its judgment of
conviction and sentence. Akbar-El claimed that the judgment was void. He did
not attach the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) describing his previous civil
actions and appeals. See, e.g., Akbar-El v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1998),
126 Ohio App.3d 644
,711 N.E.2d 236
. The common pleas court filed a motion to
dismiss.
{¶ 2} In June 2001, the court of appeals granted the motion and dismissed
the cause. This cause is now before the court upon an appeal as of right.
{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Akbar-El failed to
comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25 in commencing this action. State ex
rel. Sherrills v. Franklin Cty. Clerk of Courts (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 402
,750 N.E.2d 594, 596
. Moreover, habeas corpus, not mandamus, is the proper action to
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
seek release from prison. State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000),
89 Ohio St.3d 496
,733 N.E.2d 609
.
Judgment affirmed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
__________________
Ali A. Akbar-El, pro se.
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sherry F.
McCreary, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
__________________
2