Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Ramsayer

50 Ohio St. 3d 129

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Date: 1990-04-11
Topic: antitrust

Per Curiam. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree that respondent committed the misconduct *130cited by the board. However, we find this misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than the board recommended. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Ramsayer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree that respondent committed the misconduct *130 cited by the board. However, we find this misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than the board recommended. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.