Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
May v. Tandy Corp.
69 Ohio St. 3d 415
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1994-06-01
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- the “ ‘right to trial by jury * * * cannot be invaded or violated by either legislative act or judicial order or decree.’ ”
- former R.C. 2317.45, enacted by Am.Sub.H.B. No. 1, 142 Ohio Laws, Part 1, 1661, 1694, as part of the Tort Reform Act of 1987, violated the rights to a jury trial, due process, and equal protection and the right to a remedy
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed May v. Tandy Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 123 opinions
The judgment on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504, decided today. The cross-appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. .