Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
Manning v. Alexander
50 Ohio St. 3d 127
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1990-04-11
- Topic
- litigation
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Manning v. Alexander. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is
an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.