Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
Cyrus v. Henes
70 Ohio St. 3d 640
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1994-11-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- permanence does not imply that the addition will never be removed or replaced
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cyrus v. Henes. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 20 opinions
The judgment of the court of appeals, 89 Ohio App.3d 172, 623 N.E.2d 1256, is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the Chief Justice’s opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Brennaman v. R.M.I. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 460, 639 N.E.2d 425.