Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

Core v. State

Core v. State, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1556 (Ohio 2011)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Date
2011-06-22
Topic
general

Franklin App. No. 09AP-192,191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Core v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Franklin App. No. 09AP-192,191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2009-0088, State v. Williams, Warren App. No. CA2008-02-029, 2008-Ohio-6195; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.