Opinion · New York Supreme Court

Percival v. Jones

Percival v. Jones, 1 Johns. Cas. 393 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1800)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1800-04-15
Topic
general

The court decided, that where a point is reserved by the judge at a circuit or the sittings, it is in the nature of a special verdict, and the counsel for the plaintiff is to prepare the case, and open the argument.(c) See Jackson ex Hem. Gansevoort v. Murray, infra, vol. 2, p. 219; Gra. Prac. 2d ed. 333, 334.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Percival v. Jones. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

The court decided, that where a point is reserved by the judge at a circuit or the sittings, it is in the nature of a special verdict, and the counsel for the plaintiff is to prepare the case, and open the argument.(c)

See Jackson ex Hem. Gansevoort v. Murray, infra, vol. 2, p. 219; Gra. Prac. 2d ed. 333, 334.