Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Tannenbaum v. Hoar
Tannenbaum v. Hoar, 26 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1966)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1966-11-21
- Topic
- general
Reynolds, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint after the jury could not reach a verdict and granted a new trial. Direction of a new trial is mandatory where as here the first trial resulted in a hung jury (CPLR 4113, subd. [b] ). The instant order is not an appealable order under CPLR 5701 (subd. [a]). (Aesman v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tannenbaum v. Hoar. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint after the jury could not reach a verdict and granted a new trial. Direction of a new trial is mandatory where as here the first trial resulted in a hung jury (CPLR 4113, subd. [b] ). The instant order is not an appealable order under CPLR 5701 (subd. [a]). (Aesman v. Fox, 26 A D 2d 739; Covell v. H. R. H. Constr. Corp., 24 A D 2d 566, affd. 17 N Y 2d 709). Appeal dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.