Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Russo v. Grace Institute

153 A.D.2d 820

Type: Opinion
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1989-09-28
Topic: general

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about February 9, 1989, unanimously affirmed for reasons stated by Edward Greenfield, J. (Russo v Grace Inst., 145 Misc 2d 242.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Russo v. Grace Institute. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

RUSSO v. GRACE INSTITUTE,153 A.D.2d 820[1st Dept 1989]

JEFFREY RUSSO, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, ELAINE RUSSO,

Respondent, v. GRACE INSTITUTE, Defendant, and KALIKOW CONSTRUCTION CORP.,

Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

JEFFREY RUSSO, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, ELAINE RUSSO,

Plaintiff, v. EDWARD Z. HOLMES DETECTIVE BUREAU, Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

September 28, 1989

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about February 9, 1989, unanimously affirmed for reasons stated by Edward Greenfield, J.(Russo v. Grace Inst.,145 Misc.2d 242.)

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.