Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
People v. Dawkins
People v. Dawkins, 87 A.D.3d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 2011-08-02
- Topic
- general
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Dawkins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 65 opinions
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.