Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
People v. Dawkins
87 A.D.3d 550
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 2011-08-02
- Topic
- general
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
Citator
- Cited by
- 36 opinions
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.