Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
People v. Azeez
95 A.D.3d 1349
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 2012-05-30
- Topic
- general
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Raciti, J.), imposed November 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Mastro, A.P.J., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Azeez. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Raciti, J.), imposed November 22, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d 740 [2007]). Mastro, A.P.J., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.