Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Oliveras v. Lumetta

94 A.D.2d 676

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1983-05-20
Topic
general

Silverman, J., dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would reverse and invalidate the nomination. The subscribing witness’ attestations on Sheets Nos. 69 and 79 are internally inconsistent to the point of invalidating the sheets; either the date of the attestations or the number of signatures attested to must be false.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Oliveras v. Lumetta. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Silverman, J.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would reverse and invalidate the nomination. The subscribing witness’ attestations on Sheets Nos. 69 and 79 are internally inconsistent to the point of invalidating the sheets; either the date of the attestations or the number of signatures attested to must be false.