Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Glover Bottled Gas Corp. v. Circle M. Beverage Barn, Inc.
129 A.D.2d 678
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1987-04-20
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- applying code of professional responsibility to paralegal in affirming disqualification of firm
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Glover Bottled Gas Corp. v. Circle M. Beverage Barn, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
In an action for the recovery of a past due balance under a sales contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.
The plaintiff sought disqualification of the defendants’ attorneys on the ground of conflict of interest in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The defendants’ attorneys had hired a paralegal who had previously been employed by the plaintiff’s counsel and had worked on the litigation pending between the parties and had interviewed the plaintiff’s manager concerning the facts of this case.
While the Code of Professional Responsibility does not apply to nonlawyers, it does place a burden on attorneys to insure that their employees conduct themselves in accordance with the code (Code of Professional Responsibility, Preliminary Statement). The code has been adopted by this court to govern the conduct of attorneys within this department (see, 22 NYCRR 691.2).
Under the facts of this case disqualification of the defendants’ attorneys is proper (see, Cardinale v Golinello, 43 NY2d 288; Letizia v Letizia, 117 AD2d 587; Poli v Gara, 117 AD2d 786). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.