Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DeSantis Bros. v. Allstate Insurance
244 A.D.2d 183
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1997-11-13
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- thirty-one days were reasonable because counsel needed to review a 500-page file and conduct legal research to disclaim coverage
- delay reasonable because of need to review 500-page file and conduct legal research
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DeSantis Bros. v. Allstate Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about July 18, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendant Allstate’s cross motion for summary judgment and declared that Allstate timely disclaimed liability under its policy, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Allstate was first notified of a personal liability action against its insured, Brus Corp., almost four years after that action was commenced. Allstate’s May 2, 1986 letter advising Brus of its violation of the prompt notification provision of the policy, and