Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Insurance Company
Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Ins. Co., 235 N.Y. 514 (New York Court of Appeals 1923)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1923-01-30
- Topic
- general
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. *515 Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Crane and Andrews, JJ., on ground that the word “war” in the exception of the policy because of its association, means war in which the insured participates as a belligerent.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vanderbilt v. . the Travelers Insurance Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
*515 Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Crane and Andrews, JJ., on ground that the word “war” in the exception of the policy because of its association, means war in which the insured participates as a belligerent.