Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Russell v. . Hilton

Russell v. . Hilton, 175 N.Y. 525 (New York Court of Appeals 1903)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1903-06-25
Topic: general

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below. Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Russell v. . Hilton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 6 opinions

RUSSELLv. HILTON,175 N.Y. 525(1903)

HORACE RUSSELL et al., as Executors and Trustees under the Will of HENRY

HILTON, Deceased, Appellants and Respondents,v. EDWARD B. HILTON et

al., Respondents.

ALBERT B. HILTON et al., Appellants; HELEN HILTON et al., Respondents and

Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued June 9, 1903

Decided June 25, 1903

Jabish Holmes, Jr., Horace RussellandJames S. Darcyfor plaintiffs, appellants and respondents.Franklin BartlettandMorris J. Hirschfor Albert B. Hilton et al., appellants.Page 526J. Newton FieroandNathaniel S. Smithfor Helen Hilton et al., respondents and appellants.Welton C. PercyandGeorge M. Wrightfor Joseph F. Sanxay, appellant and respondent.Arthur H. Van Bruntfor E. Francis Hyde, appellant and respondent.Henry W. Taftfor Josephine Russell et al., appellants and respondents.David McClurefor Cornelia H. Hughes, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and VANN, JJ.Page 1