Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Romeyn v. Sickles

108 N.Y. 650

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1888-02-28
Topic
general

Rug-er, Oh. J., reads for reversal and new tria1. All concur except Andbews, J., not voting. Judgment reversed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Romeyn v. Sickles. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
47 opinions
ROMEYNv. SICKLES,108 N.Y. 650(1888)
CHARLES W. ROMEYN, Respondent,v. DANIEL E. SICKLES, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued January 26, 1888
Decided February 28, 1888
Page 651
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]Page 652

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]Page 653
Edward W. Paigefor appellant.Theron G. Strongfor respondent.
RUGER, Ch. J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur except ANDREWS, J., not voting.

Judgment reversed.