Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Ralph v. Cronk

266 N.Y. 428

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1934-12-04
Topic
general

Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the negative. Held, that the 1933 amendment to section 31 of the Personal Property Law is not to be given a retroactive construction so as to apply it to contracts existing at the date of its passage. No opinion. Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ralph v. Cronk. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
11 opinions

Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the negative. Held, that the 1933 amendment to section 31 of the Personal Property Law is not to be given a retroactive construction so as to apply it to contracts existing at the date of its passage. No opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ.