Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People v. Womack

People v. Womack, 90 N.Y.2d 974 (New York Court of Appeals 1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1997-10-21
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (229 AD2d 304), noting additionally that the defendant’s appellate delay contention is not a matter properly presented to this Court (see, CPL 470.15 [1]; 470.35 [2] [a]). Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Cipaeick and Wesley.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Womack. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
11 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (229 AD2d 304), noting additionally that the defendant’s appellate delay contention is not a matter properly presented to this Court (see, CPL 470.15 [1]; 470.35 [2] [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Cipaeick and Wesley.