Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People v. Sampsell

People v. Sampsell, 248 N.Y. 157 (New York Court of Appeals 1928)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1928-05-01
Topic
general

Per Curiam. We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, *159 and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985. We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing. The judgment should be affirmed. Cabdozo, Ch.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Sampsell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
Per Curiam.

We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, *159 and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985.

We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Cabdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Ceane, Andeews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; O’Bbien, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed.