Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People v. O'Brien
People v. O'Brien, 56 N.Y.2d 1009 (New York Court of Appeals 1982)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1982-06-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “[d]efendant’s other contention regarding alleged errors in the trial court’s charge to the jury has not been preserved for our review insofar as no exception to the charge was taken at trial.”
- “[Djefendant’s other contention regarding alleged errors in the trial court’s charge to the jury has not been preserved for our review insofar as no exception to the charge was taken at trial.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. O'Brien. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 180 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
When defendant entered a plea of guilty he forfeited his right to claim that he was deprived of a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940). Nor may defendant preserve his statutory speedy trial claim for appellate review by obtaining the consent of the prosecutor and the approval of the court at the time the plea is entered (People v Di Raffaele, 55 NY2d 234).
Order affirmed in a memorandum.