Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People Ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. . Kleinert
237 N.Y. 580
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1924-02-19
- Topic
- general
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; Cardozo and Lehman, JJ., dissent on ground that appellant is within the protection of sections 23 and 24 of the Building Zone resolution and express no opinion upon the other questions suggested in the appellant's argument. Not voting: Pound, J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People Ex Rel. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc. v. . Kleinert. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; Cardozo and Lehman, JJ., dissent on ground that appellant is within the protection of sections 23 and 24 of the Building Zone resolution and express no opinion upon the other questions suggested in the appellant's argument. Not voting: Pound, J.