Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

People Ex Rel. Marshall v. . Moore

People Ex Rel. Marshall v. . Moore, 217 N.Y. 632 (New York Court of Appeals 1916)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1916-02-01
Topic
general

Order affirmed; no opinion. Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Sea-bury and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., concurs on the sole ground that while proof of the Massachusetts statutes was necessary, it was properly supplied before the Appellate Division and this court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People Ex Rel. Marshall v. . Moore. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Sea-bury and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., concurs on the sole ground that while proof of the Massachusetts statutes was necessary, it was properly supplied before the Appellate Division and this court.