Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. State

31 N.Y.2d 678

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1972-09-28
Topic
intellectual-property-and-technology

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz;: Whether lack of a remedy in one proceeding rather than two to declare the licensing statute invalid and also to obtain a refund of licensing fees already paid violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this issue and held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights (30 N Y 2d 415).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
5 opinions

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz;: Whether lack of a remedy in one proceeding rather than two to declare the licensing statute invalid and also to obtain a refund of licensing fees already paid violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this issue and held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights (30 N Y 2d 415).