Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Murphy v. Rochester Telephone Company
240 N.Y. 629
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1925-05-05
- Topic
- general
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin, J. Not voting: Pound, J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Murphy v. Rochester Telephone Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 15 opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin, J. Not voting: Pound, J.