Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas

82 N.Y.2d 791

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1993-10-19
Topic
estate-planning

82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 689 604 N.Y.S.2d 551 In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent, v. Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued October 14, 1993.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF ROTH v. Cuevas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
82 N.Y.2d 791 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 689 604 N.Y.S.2d 551

In the Matter of Allen H. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Signers of a Petition Filed Pursuant to Section 37 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and as Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., Respondent,
v.
Carlos Cuevas, as City Clerk of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 14, 1993. Decided October 19, 1993.

O. Peter Sherwood, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young, Jonathan Pines and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants.

Townley & Updike, New York City (Douglas C. Fairhurst, Steven I. Himelstein and Zvi N. Raskin of counsel), for respondent.

Charles S. Turner, County Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester (Raymond J. Lum of counsel), for County of Monroe, amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.

Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the *794 opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238).