Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.
82 N.Y.2d 821
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1993-11-18
- Topic
- general
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Israel Rubin at the Appellate Division (188 AD2d 214; see, Didner v Keene Corp., 82 NY2d 342 [decided today]; Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp. Med. Ctr., 82 NY2d 332 [decided today]). *825 Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,82 N.Y.2d 821(1993)
In the Matter of NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION (BROOKLYN NAVAL SHIPYARD
CASES).
GENEVIEVE DUDICK, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of GRESKA
DUDICK, Deceased, et al., Respondents, KEENE CORPORATION, Appellant. (And
Other Actions.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued October 13, 1993
Decided November 18, 1993
Page 822
Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE.