Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Moscon v. Thomford

Matter of Moscon v. Thomford, 260 N.Y. 578 (New York Court of Appeals 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1932-10-25
Topic: general

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Dissenting: Kellogg, J. Not sitting: Pound, Ch. J., and Crouch, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter of Moscon v. Thomford. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MATTER OF MOSCON v. THOMFORD,260 N.Y. 578(1932)

In the Matter of the Claim of PHILIP MOSCON, Respondent, against MARTIN

THOMFORD et al., Appellants.

STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 5, 1932

Decided October 25, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.Page 579

Frank L. Wardfor appellants.John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General(Joseph A.McLaughlinandRoy Wiedersumof counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Dissenting: KELLOGG, J. Not sitting: POUND, Ch. J., and CROUCH, J.