Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Lucchese v. Rotella

60 N.Y.2d 815

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1983-10-28
Topic
international-arbitration

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for those reasons set forth in the memorandum of the Appellate Division which relate to the failure to abide by the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 6-108 of the Election Law. While we do not address the appropriateness or propriety of instituting this proceeding in Albany County rather than in Rockland County where the controversy arose, we do not condone the practice. Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur. Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lucchese v. Rotella. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for those reasons set forth in the memorandum of the Appellate Division which relate to the failure to abide by the requirements of subdivision 1 of section 6-108 of the Election Law.

While we do not address the appropriateness or propriety of instituting this proceeding in Albany County rather than in Rockland County where the controversy arose, we do not condone the practice.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.