Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Kalish v. Krieger

35 N.Y.2d 864

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1974-12-18
Topic
international-arbitration

*865Memorandum. In the ease of these as with most jury instructions, additional reflection might suggest reorganization, slightly different emphases, and more precise phrasing. We find here, however, neither errors of substance nor significant confusion between those portions of the instructions relating to contributory negligence and those relating to proximate causation. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Babin concur; Judge Stevens taking no part.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kalish v. Krieger. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

*865 Memorandum. In the ease of these as with most jury instructions, additional reflection might suggest reorganization, slightly different emphases, and more precise phrasing. We find here, however, neither errors of substance nor significant confusion between those portions of the instructions relating to contributory negligence and those relating to proximate causation.

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Babin concur; Judge Stevens taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.