Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Hooper v. Power
Hooper v. Power, 12 N.Y.2d 764 (New York Court of Appeals 1962)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1962-11-01
- Topic
- general
Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N Y 2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion. ' Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Feoessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hooper v. Power. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Order affirmed, without costs. We hold that the signatures in the group containing 184 signatures were valid (see Matter of Di Crocco v. Power, 12 N Y 2d 762, decided herewith) and that the signatures in the groups containing 220 and 156 signatures respectively were valid for the reasons stated in the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. No opinion. '
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Feoessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.