Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
Gropp v. . the Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 205 N.Y. 617 (New York Court of Appeals 1912)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1912-06-04
- Topic
- general
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below; no opinion. Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.