Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Glamm v. City of Amsterdam
49 N.Y.2d 714
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1980-02-05
- Topic
- general
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (67 AD2d 1056; see, also, Matter of Beary v City of Rye, 44 NY2d 398). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Glamm v. City of Amsterdam. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 23 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (67 AD2d 1056; see, also, Matter of Beary v City of Rye, 44 NY2d 398).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.