Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Russo

58 N.Y.2d 929

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1983-02-23
Topic
commercial

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 575). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Federal Deposit Insurance v. Russo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 575).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.